Well here is something else that came to me while sleeping and it stemmed from what you said before
Remember, this was originally supposed to be a way for BASIC programmers to slide over to C/C++.
That is all well and good, but now that we have been experimenting we have opened a door to many things. What about the people that use python, lua, and ruby, they are probably more in number than old basic users. And what about new people coming to c/c++, Jade has shown that we can offer wrappers for all of these folks.
So JADE as it is now is perfect for the original goal BASIC to C/C++.
But I think we could have more wrappers as you say that can bring more people the power of c/c++
I guess they could be all named differently, maybe there are different kind of Jade's, let me check... yeah there are different kind of Jades:
http://www.travelchinaguide.com/intro/arts/jade.htm even nice shorter chinese names for them.
About licencing, I used MIT before and was happy with that.
I will make a nicer SFML2 demo then using JADE official syntax and then fork off a version with another type of Jade, for new comers to C++ from python, ruby and lua (less verbose, but still nice and Basicy)